 |
ClassicConnect "640k ought to be enough for everybody."
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
xX_D4rkW1ng_Xx Member

Joined: 22 Mar 2026 Posts: 27 Location: Somewhere in Europe. MSN name is on Crosstalk.
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2026 5:49 pm Post subject: Messing around with the "Intel Compute Stick" |
|
|
Beginning
So semi-recently i got myself an Intel Compute stick [model STK1A32SC released Q1 of 2016. Mine was manufactured in 2018]. I didn't get it as a multimedia PC, as i don't need that.
Aside from minor scratches on the back, it was in a good state. And i'm not sure if this is common in these, but it automatically turns on when plugged into power, and i haven't seen an option in the BIOS of it to make it stop doing that. Also it's CMOS battery is dead, nice.
Continuation, and my experiences so far
It's previous owner forgot to wipe it, so i had to do that myself, and so that meant ditching windows 10 that was on it, and for now, installing Linux Mint so it was usable.
It was an audible change. In windows 10, the fan I'm pretty sure it has a single fan, poor thing was kicking in on the start, and after a few minutes was extremely loud. With Mint, it remained largely silent until an heavy task was queued up, and then it would just continue blaring.
Another annoyance is when trying to shutdown this slab-of-computing. When you try to quit from the OS, it dosen't shutdown fully, and you need to hold down the power button until it finally decides that shutting down is what it is gonna actually do. And even then it takes a bit for it to slowly shutdown.
I have no idea what it's doing that is preventing it from shutting down when the OS calls it, as no video output is being sent from it over HDMI[/b]
Aside from those odd quirks, it's actually not bad. It works fine as a portable PC, although i will admit i bought it kinda blind, thought it had an internal battery like a laptop, and had 8 GB of RAM. My bad.
Conclusion
I should not buy things blind, that is a good way to loose money...aside from that, it's well, a portable PC. And solidly, 2GB Ram is way more than enough...I wish i did my research, as model STK2M364CC is what i would have went with instead [4GB of RAM, 64 GB eMMC instead of 32, 3 USB 3.0 ports, and dosen't use an Intel Atom], but oh well, im stuck with mine, and i will use it.
As for the reason i got it, it was mainly for trying out Linux Distros personally for my future switch. But also, i might just ditch that idea and install something else onto there...Maybe XP, who knows. _________________ Why can't the internet be colorfull again?
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
leefymoon Member

Joined: 22 Apr 2026 Age: 16 Posts: 16 Location: taco bell
|
Posted: Wed May 06, 2026 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
omg that's still dope that you have one... honestly xp on it would be very funny you should try that! _________________ your favorite exploder
leefy | he/they
"mentally short? i think that's just called being dumb." - leefy 2025 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xX_D4rkW1ng_Xx Member

Joined: 22 Mar 2026 Posts: 27 Location: Somewhere in Europe. MSN name is on Crosstalk.
|
Posted: Thu May 07, 2026 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| leefymoon wrote: | | omg that's still dope that you have one... honestly xp on it would be very funny you should try that! |
Maybe i should...not sure, i am not even sure i have an XP CD anywhere in my house.
Also, would 32 GB be accurate for XP times? _________________ Why can't the internet be colorfull again?
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VCSMaster Member

Joined: 25 May 2025 Age: 25 Posts: 162 Location: Southeastern USA
|
Posted: Fri May 08, 2026 3:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| 32 gigs of storage? That's more than a lot of people had when XP was new. An awful lot of people were running 10 gig or even 5 gig drives in 2001 if you were unlucky. Dell was shipping 20 gig drives even in I think 2004 on base models, though by that point you could probably get 80 gigs if you had the money and wanted. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xX_D4rkW1ng_Xx Member

Joined: 22 Mar 2026 Posts: 27 Location: Somewhere in Europe. MSN name is on Crosstalk.
|
Posted: Fri May 08, 2026 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| VCSMaster wrote: | | 32 gigs of storage? That's more than a lot of people had when XP was new. An awful lot of people were running 10 gig or even 5 gig drives in 2001 if you were unlucky. Dell was shipping 20 gig drives even in I think 2004 on base models, though by that point you could probably get 80 gigs if you had the money and wanted. |
So, accurate for circa 2005-2006ish?
No but seriously, what was it with windows during the whole 2000s being more customizable then now. not sure if to include windows ME and 2000 into here, but since they released at the start of the decade, might aswell even if my memory of their customizable options is that they were more limited
I understand that they wanted to go more onto the mobile/touchscreen route, but that doesn't mean everyone wants their desktops looking like their office ones.
Although now that i think of it, despite personally liking Vista's style, i don't recall it being one of the more customizable Microsoft OS of the decade, but introducing Aero as a style is a positive in my book. _________________ Why can't the internet be colorfull again?
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VCSMaster Member

Joined: 25 May 2025 Age: 25 Posts: 162 Location: Southeastern USA
|
Posted: Fri May 08, 2026 11:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| What do you mean "More customizable?" Almost all of it was done with third party tools and if you include that, modern Windows is WAY more configurable with WinAeroTweaker than NT/2K/XP ever were. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xX_D4rkW1ng_Xx Member

Joined: 22 Mar 2026 Posts: 27 Location: Somewhere in Europe. MSN name is on Crosstalk.
|
Posted: Sat May 09, 2026 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| VCSMaster wrote: | | What do you mean "More customizable?" Almost all of it was done with third party tools and if you include that, modern Windows is WAY more configurable with WinAeroTweaker than NT/2K/XP ever were. |
Now that you mention WinAeroTweaker, yeah, modern Windows is more configurable...
But i was talking more from a "official" point of view. Like software makers allowing for easy use of skins for the software, even if said skins were third-party.
I knew third-party apps would be used, and despite my efforts im unsure how hard it was to for example: add a custom theme to Windows XP or Vista. If it turns out it would be a simple drag-into-a-folder operation i will be embarrassed, and if memory serves that was how it worked since 7
I remember seeing Mac OS docks on Windows Desktop, but frankly i don't remember the name of that. And im unsure if it was just one app that kept coming back or multiple different ones.
It just feels like not only was desktop customization more common and company accepted in the 2000s, but more people did it aswell, although i wouldn't be suprised if i have a biased point of view. _________________ Why can't the internet be colorfull again?
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
VCSMaster Member

Joined: 25 May 2025 Age: 25 Posts: 162 Location: Southeastern USA
|
Posted: Sat May 09, 2026 11:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WinAmp and XMPlay having skins didn't really mean Windows was more customizable.
As far as adding themes, it's been a LONG time since I tried, most of the ones out there were gaudy to say the least. Pretty sure it was as simple as double clicking the theme file. The files were the same at least through 7 and there was even some compatibility there.
Myself, I find most "personalized" copies of software to be beyond ugly, nearly to the point of uselessness, hence my utter lack of desire to ever do it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
smartDark Style by Smartor
Powered by phpBB 2.0.25 CC Mod © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|